Google search engineGoogle search engine
HomeFeaturesVIEW 2025 ARCTIC CAT SNOWMOBILES PHOTOS

VIEW 2025 ARCTIC CAT SNOWMOBILES PHOTOS

If you want to view high-resolution studio photos of the new 2025 Arctic Cat snowmobiles, please visit the Arctic Cat Legacy side of ArcticInsider.com HERE. I will be sharing more information on all those units Friday at 9am CST. – Kale

RELATED ARTICLES

36 COMMENTS

  1. I’m very disappointed with the mountain cat colour scheme if I’m paying for all the bells and whistles give me a all black option so I can do what I want not one ugly blue colour but two at least give me a black tunnel so I can swap out all that ugly dark blue why make this hard cat. Tip to the marketing team if your going to try trendy colour scheme give us a black or at least a cat green model we bleed green not two shades of blue. Engineering teem killed it love the sled keep pushing maybe talk to the marketing team.

      • I think what Tyler is saying is the Black should be offered on the premium models. It looks like it is only offered on the 2 most base models. 600 154 es and 858 154 3.0. If customers had their choice to order like this: color, engine, shock package, track length and lug, and gauge package. The all black would outsell all the other colors combined me thinks. For my market the best seller would be All black 165 3.0 manual start with AC5S shocks and the G8 gauge.

    • What’s IFP. On the 7000. Think it has a heated seat or power steering. Or is a stripO like last year. Really guys this is bad no snow. New sleds waiting to hit the snow and is the middle of January. And were all Cool the new sleds, LOL.

  2. Everyone wants to see a snowmobile manufacturer bring back a triple. I think the ZR 858 lineup – ZR, Sno Pro and ATAC – represent the best trail-oriented “triple” in the industry right now.

      • Jerry,
        800 never made 165 hp, or even 160. Most of them put out 153 to 155 on the dyno. AC’s marketing department started off calling it a 160 hp class engine when doo released the 850, then magically bumped it to 165 hp class, despite no changes at all being made to the engine (they couldn’t market it by cc because they had to try and avoid the fact that both doo, and poo had 850 machines.)
        Jim
        The turbo is advertised as “200 class” by ac.

        • The 800 motor, done on a dyno same day with the others 850’s was competitive. 156-160ish. Play the lowball game and it is 173. Call it 170 if you need to. The big boys claimed 120 mph at 6000 feet. Way faster than I will ever need.

  3. What are the rumors that the engine guru’s will be putting together a 650 twin using the lower crank case and that of the new 858 motor? I can wait.

  4. I know all dynos are different, but I knew what the hp was on my zrs, firecat, crossfires,1100 turbo as new models before I even rode them. Now ac saying 125 class and a dyno shows 118 or ac says165 class but dyno says 155. In 2004 arctic claimed the new f6 was 118 and every dyno in 2004 from every magazine out there said the same. Same with 2010 800ho cat said 160 and that’s what they were. When it comes to sleds even if you dont need the power it’s all about bragging rights, especially cat riders. So if your buddy has a turbo 850 as cat guy you wanna know what the 858 puts out. Cat knows exactly what a dyno says about the 858 so whats the secret. And as for me I’ve been on a turbo 4 stroke since 2014 and in 25 I dont want another procross as my 22 thundercat was going to be the last procross I’d buy.So I’d be putting my money down on a catalyst 4stroke turbo. But we dont know if that will ever happen cause cat says nothing about it. And if I knew that cat had no plans of a 4stroke turbo catalyst I would buy a 25 858. Mabey cat will release the 26 models soon.

  5. To couple the rear arms or not to couple? That is the question. Cats flipped on that many times since 1966. Each generation using what they learned on the track. Each version having merits. Throw in longer travel every few years and I would assume that rocking horse issues would increase and require different solutions. Blows my mind thinking about 1962 and the engines in the rear on the tunnel, 1966 the engines low and down in the pan, 1976 Pantera bulkhead the engines moved a smidge towards the tunnel and almost framed in aluminum panels, giving a peak at modern construction, new slightly longer travel skid but still uncoupled then the chassis is abandoned 3 years later. Cost verses performance verses market trends and sales etc. I guess. Point is as sleds evolve to couple or not to couple appears to be the eternal engineering debate as well as where the engine goes.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular